A California Jury Finds The Bard IVC Filter Is Negligently Designed

Leaving a retrievable IVC filter in too long can cause life-threatening blood clots and device migration
Friday, August 27, 2021 - Plaintiffs are suing Bard Peripheral Vascular and C.R. Bard, Inc., for bringing to market a faulty medical device that had no place ever being invented. More than 8000 cases are pending in federal district courts across the US from individuals that have experienced Bard IVD filter complications. The spider-like device was doomed from the start because it would have eventually harmed every patient in which it was implanted given the faulty logic of its design. On the one hand, the Bard IVC (interior vena cava) filter is designed to irritate within the artery and elicit an immune system response of healing and creating scar tissue that encapsulates and holds the device in place. On the other hand, that scar tissue is what prevents its necessary removal after the device has achieved its desired purpose of trapping blood clots after about 60-90 days after being inserted. Make no mistakes; the Bard IVC filter is a temporary device that is intended to be removed and can not be left inside the body for a prolonged period. When a surgeon tries to remove the IVC filter they have to tug and pull on it, exerting more force than is safe and can damage the artery. Other times, using force to remove the device can cause it to break into multiple pieces, some removed, some left embedded in the artery, and some pieces free to migrate and embolise to the heart or lungs, potentially causing life-threatening damage to other organs also.
A Santa Barbara jury confirmed that opinion when it decided in favor of a plaintiff recently who alleged that the design of the Bard IVC filter was negligent. According to PR Newswire (PRN), "A jury awarded $926,000 to a plaintiff in an IVC filter case after unanimously finding that Bard had negligently designed the filter." When the removal of the IVC filter goes wrong, emergency revision surgery is required with all of the risks that major surgery and anesthesia entails. In the IVC filter lawsuit above, "Justin Peterson, represented by Martin Baughman PLLC, Dallas, Texas, was injured when a Bard Eclipse IVC filter perforated his vena cava and duodenum leading to massive bleeding and the necessity of an open abdominal surgery to retrieve the filter and repair the damaged blood vessel and small intestine," PRN wrote. The first bellwether IVC filter trial resulted in a multi-million dollar jury award to a woman that almost died from the procedure. "Plaintiff Sherr-Una Booker was implanted in June 2007 with a Bard G2 IVC filter to mitigate her risk of pulmonary embolism during or after a surgery, according to court documents," MassDevice.com, wrote.
Leaving a retrievable IVC filter in too long remains the item of contention for those who have been injured by the device. If you or a loved one have had an IVC filter implanted and has been unsuccessful in removing the device, you may be at risk of the device producing blood clots or tilting and lacerating the inferior vena cava.
More Recent IVC Filter Lawsuit News:
- Scientific Authors Agree That IVC Filters May Have Been Overused In Anticipation of Blood Clots Occurring | 2/26/2022
- IVC Filter Use Has Skyrocketed And So Have Patient Complaints | 2/22/2022
- IVC Filter Removal Continues To Generate Controversy In Medical Circles | 2/12/2022
- Pulmonary Embolism Kills Over 100,000 People Each Year Hospitalized With Traumatic Injury | 2/7/2022
- Bard Faces Thousands Of IVC Filter Lawsuits Over The Product's Unique Inherent Design Defects | 2/2/2022
- Stanford's Dr. Kuo Has Helped Pioneer Advanced IVC Filter Laser Retrieval | 1/28/2022
- Doctors Struggle With Deciding When Is The Optimal Time To Remove A Patient's IVC Filter | 1/14/2022
- Doctors May Use IVC Filters More Often Now That Laser Removal Is An Option | 1/10/2022
- IVC Filter Lasers Highlights Focus Attention On Removal Complications | 1/4/2022
- IVC Filter Retrieval Complications Have Been Known For Years | 12/30/2021
- Lasers May Now Enable Doctors To Safely Retrieve Embedded IVC Filters | 12/22/2021
- IVC Filters May Do Nothing To Prevent Death Or Pulmonary Embolism For Trauma Patients | 12/16/2021
- IVC Filters Can Help Save The Lives Of Young People That Experience Multiple Sudden Blood Clots | 12/1/2021
- The FDA Recommends That An IVC Filter Stay In Place No Longer Than Two Months | 11/26/2021
- Bard Sales Reps, Surgeons, And Even The FDA All Looked The Other Way And Failed To Warn IVC Filter Patients | 11/18/2021
- Ozone Cleaning Products Are Not FDA Approved And May Be Responsible For CPAP Foam Insulation Breakdown | 11/12/2021
- Patients Should Know Of All Of The Risks Of Having An IVC Filter Implanted To Trap Blood Clots | 11/12/2021
- Blood Clot Patients Chest Pain Patients Are Talking To IVC Filter Lawyers About Holding Bard Accountable | 11/5/2021
- The IVC Filter Is Substantially Similar To The Faulty And Defective Essure Birth Control Device | 11/1/2021
- The Food And Drug Administration Has Been Warning Surgeons About The IVC Filters Design Flaws For More Than A decade | 10/28/2021
- IVC Filter Heart Pain Could Be From The Device Having Fractured Into Pieces | 10/25/2021
- Bellwether Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Highlights The Design Flaws | 10/20/2021
- IVC Filters Could Be Unnecessary If A Person Leads A Healthy Lifestyle | 10/15/2021
- The EPA's Farm Flagger Ban Came Decades Too Late for Thousands of Farm Workers Who Now Have Parkinson's disease | 10/12/2021
- Bard IVC Filters May Tilt, Migrate and Perforate The Artery Where They Were Implanted | 10/11/2021
- A Report Published In 2006 Documented IVC Filter Catastrophies | 10/5/2021
- Medical Safety Groups Call For The End of the FDA Fast-Track Medical Device Approval Process | 9/30/2021
- IVC Filters May Not Be Needed And Offer No Reduction In Mortality | 9/27/2021
- IVC Filters Are Implanted As A Last Resort And Left In Place Only If Blood Clotting Continues And There Is No Alternative | 9/24/2021
- IVC Filters Are A Bad Idea Fraught With Life-Threating Complications | 9/20/2021
- Doctors May Consider Vitamin K Anti-Coagulant Therapy Before Recommending IVC Filters | 9/15/2021
- Surgeons May Not Be Able To Retreive the Bard IVC Filter After Two or Three Months | 9/11/2021
- A High Failure Rate For IVC Filter Removal Can Be Expected And Surgeons Should Prepare For The Worse | 9/7/2021
- Thousands Of IVC Filters May Eventually Experience Catastrophic Failure | 9/2/2021
- Most Bard IVC Filters are Doomed To Failure and Surgeons Would Never Attempt To Retrieve It | 8/31/2021
- Scar Tissue Build Up After 60 Days May Prevent Safe Bard IVC Filter Removal | 8/23/2021
- IVC Filter Removal Requires Using Force When Trapped In Place By Scar Tissue | 8/19/2021
- Bard IVC Filters Have Caused Severe Damage More Than 10% Of The Time | 8/14/2021
- A Fourth Jury Finds Bard IVC Filters Defective | 8/10/2021
- Patients With IVC Filters Should Contact Their Physicians Immediately | 12/21/2018
- Lawsuits Filed Across Wide Variety of IVC Filter Manufacturers | 12/18/2018
- IVC Filter Patients May Be Eligible to File A Claim Against CR Bard | 12/13/2018
- IVC Filter Manufacturers Profit When Patients Misinformed | 12/10/2018
- IVC Filter Litigation is Growing Every Day | 12/7/2018
- Doctors May Be Neglecting IVC Filter Device Patients | 12/4/2018
- CR Bard Forced To Compensate Injured IVC Filter Patients | 11/27/2018
- Judge Confirms IVC Filter Malfunction and Punitive Damages Award | 8/31/2018
- Bellwether Trials Underway For Bard IVC Filters | 8/29/2018
- The Bard IVC Filter May Not Have Been Adequately Tested | 8/27/2018
No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Suffered from Organ Damage, Severe Bleeding, Stroke, or Death
OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others, and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.