Information about Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits from Lawyers Handling IVC Filter Lawsuits

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Review

IVC Filter Lawsuits

A High Failure Rate For IVC Filter Removal Can Be Expected And Surgeons Should Prepare For The Worse

Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits

IVC filter surgeons should learn to use lasers to address complications from eventual filter removal surgery

Tuesday, September 7, 2021 - Most IVC filter surgeons who implant the device have no idea how to remove them and need to refer their patients to another physician. Bard IVC filter complications that require immediate emergency removal and those that have become ensnared by scar tissue on the arterial wall, have led to a cottage industry for surgeons who learn how to use lasers to remove faulty medical devices. According to a report in Helio.com on the use of lasers to retrieve IVC filters that are difficult to remove, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advises IVC filter surgeons that, "implanting physicians consider removing retrievable IVC filters as soon as they are no longer indicated, according to the release. Filters can fracture and travel through the bloodstream to other parts of the body, cause lower limb deep vein thrombosis; and IVC occlusion. However, the failure rate for filter removal is high, and limited removal options exist if the filter has become difficult to remove." Dutch company Royal Phillps recently received a patent for a dedicated IVC filter removal laser. The lasers lacerate and cauterize scar tissue on the arterial wall and allow the device to be removed as planned. The Royal Phillips IVC Filter Removal Laser was granted breakthrough device status by the FDA. Phillips lasers have addressed the pressing need to safely removed the negligently designed Bard IVC filter. "It is estimated that in the United States more than one million patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) filters would benefit from filter removal to reduce the risk of long-term complications," according to Phillips. IVC filter patients that have had to have suffered through a second, third or more revision surgeries have hired Bard IVC filter lawyers to represent them when filing a claim against the manufacturer.

A California jury recently found that the Bard IVC filter is negligently designed and doomed to failure. One of the potentially life-threatening complications is that the device could tilt and puncture the IVC wall, and cause internal bleeding or infection. Inexperienced surgeons may pull too hard on the device during the removal surgery as scar tissue build-up prevents it from easily sliding out as planned, sending shrapnel through the artery and into the lungs or heart. Yanking on the device could damage the artery and cause internal bleeding. Pieces of a broken IVC filter are free to travel where they may and will lacerate the tissue it comes into contact with. Scar tissue may also develop if the device is left in too long and not promptly removed, preventing the device from ever being removed. The IVC filter can be hazardous if it works as directed because trapped blood clots can grow larger and eventually break free from the filter, travel to the lungs causing a pulmonary thrombosis or heart attack.

More Recent IVC Filter Lawsuit News:

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Suffered from Organ Damage, Severe Bleeding, Stroke, or Death

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others, and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.