Information about Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits from Lawyers Handling IVC Filter Lawsuits

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Review

IVC Filter Lawsuits

IVC Filter Removal Requires Using Force When Trapped In Place By Scar Tissue

Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits

Cardiologists are more concerned with preventing heart attacks in critically ill patients than training how to remove the device safely

Thursday, August 19, 2021 - If an IVC filter is left inside the patient for more than a few months, irritation of the VC wall may occur and cause scar tissue to encapsulate the device making retrieval impossible without breaking it into bits and pieces. These metal bits and pieces can cause injury and death as they travel through the bloodstream to the heart and lungs. Physicians must pull and tug and can damage the vena cava when attempting to remove the IVC filter. In as little as one month, an IVC filter that was supposed to be temporary can self-convert to be permanent by becoming encased in scar tissue, according to William T. Kuo, MD of Stanford University in California. Patients have nowhere to turn when their doctor declines to remove the device. Individuals that have suffered injuries and the loved ones of those who have died from the faulty medical device have hired an IVC filter lawyer to help them file a claim for lump-sum monetary damages. IVC injury patients say they would not have chosen the procedure, had they been forewarned of the risks of device fracture and the difficulties retrieving it.

Bard IVC filters are spider-like devices inserted into the inferior vena cava (IVC). The device traps larger blood clots before they travel to small veins and cause a potentially life-threatening blockage. An IVC filter is a risky device to be used only when all other chemical alternatives like blood thinners have failed. IVC filter should be retrieved when the risks of blood clots have subsided, however, physicians are hesitant to perform the procedure due to the device's tendency to break up into pieces. The Food and Drug Administration's main concern is that patients are unaware that the device is only temporary and short-term and that its inevitable removal could lead to permanent injury and death.

According to the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (CRF), "It’s well established that IVC filters left in place for too long can cause harm. The US Food and Drug Administration advises that the device should come out as soon as possible once acute pulmonary embolism is no longer a risk. But retrieval is often overlooked and sometimes it’s easier said than done, especially when the IVC filters have been in place for several years." IVC filter removal is risky and the use of force must be applied. Companies are now exploring using lasers to lessen the risk of IVC device failures. Bard IVC filter complications may be life-threatening including becoming permanently and irreversibly trapped in scar tissue within the vena cava. Bard IVC filters were rushed to market using the flawed FDA Fast-track approval system designed to circumvent the delays of going through a proper human testing and approval process. The fast-track approval system was invented to help save lives by rushing the latest medical technology to market.

">

More Recent IVC Filter Lawsuit News:

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Suffered from Organ Damage, Severe Bleeding, Stroke, or Death

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others, and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.