Information about Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits from Lawyers Handling IVC Filter Lawsuits

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Review

IVC Filter Lawsuits

IVC Filters Are A Bad Idea Fraught With Life-Threating Complications

Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits

A Chinese study questions the effectiveness of the IVC filter in the best of scenarios

Monday, September 20, 2021 - IVC filters are used by doctors to treat patients that have a likelihood of developing blood clots and do not respond to chemical blood thinner therapy. The filter's overall effectiveness is in question because of the difficulty in removing it after it has done its job. IVC filters are good at trapping blood clots. That is not in dispute. What is being questioned is that after a short time of sixty to ninety days, the little spider-like device can become so full of clots that it becomes a hazard of growing in size exponentially and having the clots break off and continue on their way to the lungs, heart, or brain. If the device is left inside the artery too long it can become encased by scar tissue and impossible to remove without major surgery, a procedure that few if any surgeons are willing to perform. What surgeons do instead, is to try and remove the device by forcing it which often results in the fragile IVC filter breaking into pieces that can either puncture the artery causing internal bleeding and infection or travel with the flow of blood to the major organ and potentially cause instant death. These facts are not in dispute and many have hired Bard IVC filter lawyers and filed suit against Bard, the device maker, for bringing a faulty medical device to market. The efficacy of using IVC filters was challenged by a study out of China that called into question whether or not it was even worth the risks. "In a recent meta-analysis, Yang Liu, Huan Lu (Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China), and colleagues found insufficient evidence to prove that inferior vena cava (IVC) filters can reduce pulmonary embolism (PE)-related mortality and overall mortality," wrote VenusNews.

Royal Phillips has developed a laser to help in removing the device. If a doctor is properly trained in its use, the laser may be able to excise the filter from the scar tissue on the inner arterial wall and cauterize the tissue left behind. Lasers, however, may not be for several months to a year from now as the company has only recently been granted "breakthrough device" status by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and could qualify for fast-track approval. I can see no reason to deny such a request given Bard IVC filter complications the faulty medical device carries. In the meantime, thousands of patients with blood clotting issues that do not respond to treatment may think having an IVC filter implanted is their only chance of survival. People that have had IVC filters implanted have been unable to have them retrieved. Some have had them break into tiny, life-threatening fragments. Expert fear that the Bard IVC filter may are overused when blood thinners would have done the trick, although doctors would never admit this. Very few doctors, however, anticipated the life-threatening consequences of not being able to retrieve the device.

More Recent IVC Filter Lawsuit News:

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Suffered from Organ Damage, Severe Bleeding, Stroke, or Death

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others, and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.