Information about Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits from Lawyers Handling IVC Filter Lawsuits

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Review

IVC Filter Lawsuits

Bellwether Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Highlights The Design Flaws

Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits

Executives at Bard should have known that the IVC Filter's design promoted tilting and migration

Wednesday, October 20, 2021 - Court cases in 2021 have brought to light that the Bard IVC filter has a history of being fragile enough to break apart inside the body and cause catastrophic injuries. The faulty medical device must be especially safe because of the location where it is placed, and the function it is expected to perform. The IVC filter is a delicate, spider-like device that is set into the inferior vena cava, a large vein that carries the deoxygenated blood from the lower and middle body into the right atrium of the heart, according to Wikipedia. Pieces of the broken device could flow into the heart or lungs and cause injury or death. Open surgery may be required to attempt to retrieve the broken pieces. A woman sued Bard for just that reason and was one of the four judgments handed down in court in favor of people suing Bard over Bard IVC Filter complications in 2021.

According to an article in Mass Device.com (MD), the plaintiff was implanted with the Bard IVC Filter in 2007 and by 2014 the filter had "tilted to penetrate the artery's wall and fractured, leaving one strut in (the plaintiff's) right atrium. During surgery in July 2014 to remove the filter and struts, her tricuspid valve was damaged, necessitating a subsequent open surgical repair. Surgeons were unable to remove one of the fractured struts, which remains embedded in the wall of Booker's IVC, according to the documents." The woman was awarded 4 million dollars, about three-quarters of which was for punitive damages as Bard was found to have failed to warn the plaintiff of the dangers that the device had a higher failure rate than other IVC filters and could break apart and cause organ damage. The defendants should know and warn patients of the dangers of using the Bard IVC filter if the device is left in place too long or the propensities to damage it when a surgeon tries to remove it. The IVC filter can become trapped in scar tissue and tugging on it to get it to break free can break it into pieces. Leaving the device in place for more than a few months can allow it to clog and become a source of blood clots that may break free and travel to the heart or lungs. Bard IVC Filter lawyers cited ten incidences of the same Bard filter experiencing tilting and migration. The case turned in favor of the plaintiff when a company employee who helped engineer the device told the jury that the device design was inherently flawed and encouraged it to tilt to one side and then migrate elsewhere in the IVC. MD tells readers that the judge told the jurors that given the evidence it could be inferred that executives at Bard were aware of the device's design flaw and failed to warn the patient. "The jury reasonably could have concluded from this evidence that Bard knew the G2 filter experienced caudal migration at rates higher than other filters and that this type of failure could lead to other complications."

More Recent IVC Filter Lawsuit News:

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Suffered from Organ Damage, Severe Bleeding, Stroke, or Death

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others, and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.