Information about Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits from Lawyers Handling IVC Filter Lawsuits

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Review

IVC Filter Lawsuits

IVC Filters Are Implanted As A Last Resort And Left In Place Only If Blood Clotting Continues And There Is No Alternative

Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits

The IVC filter strategy may only postpone a patient's inevitable death if nothing can stop blood clots from forming in the first place

Friday, September 24, 2021 - The procedure to insert the IVC filter entails inserting a catheter, a tunnel-like device, into the large vein in the leg and snaked into position. The filter is then inserted into the catheter and placed inside the artery. Once in place, "the interventional radiologist will release the filter, allowing it to fully expand and attach itself to the walls of the blood vessel," according to RadiologyInfo.com, a leading source of cardiovascular medical information The device is designed to cause irritation on the arterial wall and encourage scar tissue to form keeping it in place. The longer the device is left in place, the dirtier it becomes and the more likely it will be impossible to remove. Bard IVC filter complications include breaking the device. If that happens, pieces could travel to the heart or lungs and become embedded, leaving the patient at risk of instant death at any time.

Newer IVC filters are advertised to patients as removable. Keeping the device inside a major artery for too long, however, may lead to life-threatening complications. The delicate, spider-like device catches blood clots in the artery in the upper leg before they can travel to the lungs or lungs. Blood clots that reach the lungs or heart may cause "severe complications such as pain, difficulty breathing, shortness of breath or even death," according to Radiologyinfo.com. The publication stresses that the IVC filter should be removed within six months. Some doctors are hesitant to perform the procedure. Those that attempt to remove the IVC filter may have no choice other than to use force to remove it by yanking and tugging on it. When a surgeon forces the device from the scar tissue within which it has become encapsulated, they run the risk of tearing the artery and causing internal bleeding, infection, etc.

Patients have filed Bard IVC Filter lawsuits against the device's manufacturers because they were unaware of the complications that were likely to occur. IVC filters have been reported to have tilted and penetrated the artery creating more problems. Patients have made reports to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) MAUDE database that records failed medical devices stating that the Bard IVC filter has fractured, perforated the artery, and migrated elsewhere, leading to cardiac arrest and death. IVC filter patients usually have a history of developing blood clots in the legs and no longer respond to blood thinner medication. This often happens in patients that have had a traumatic injury or are immobile. The website infers that IVC filters should be used as a last resort when blood thinners have failed and also that the device may be left permanently in place if the alternative is blood clots continuing to travel to the lungs and heart.

More Recent IVC Filter Lawsuit News:

No-Cost, No-Obligation Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Suffered from Organ Damage, Severe Bleeding, Stroke, or Death

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others, and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.